Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:36

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Utah doctors see promising results from new radiation therapy for brain tumors - KSLTV.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Pokémon Fan Loses "20 Years Worth Of Data" After Performing Switch 2 Transfer - Nintendo Life
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Snakes in the yard … maybe more in the future - ironmountaindailynews.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Did you become a cuckold for your wife?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
MIT Discovers Magnetic Superconductor in Pencil Lead - SciTechDaily